Winter
2003 - The Bush Administration
MPG
by Carly
Wyatt
Photos by Photographer
Misel Cruzado pulled
into a Bellingham Shell station to fuel up his 1995 Mitsubishi Montero.
It takes $32 to fill up his tank, which he does every three days. He commutes,
but said he didnt consider the fuel efficiency of his vehicle before
purchasing the SUV. He liked the car and that was all that mattered, he
said.
President George W.
Bush recently proposed an increase of 1.5 miles per gallon in Corporate
Average Fuel Economy standards for SUVs and light trucks. He also announced
$1.2 billion for research on pollution-free vehicles, which he said would
help the United States lessen its dependence on foreign oil while eliminating
vehicle emissions that contribute to global warming.
In the 2003 State
of the Union address, Bush said he wanted to promote energy independence
for the country, while dramatically improving the environment. Two weeks
prior, however, he had announced an increased tax break for small businesses
that purchase large SUVs.
In 1975, Congress
passed CAFE standards, requiring automakers to meet certain standards
of fuel efficiency for their entire line of vehicles each year.
Environmental Protection
Agency spokesperson Wayne Elson said the standards are currently set at
27.5 miles per gallon for cars and 20.7 mpg for light trucks. These standards
have remained unchanged for nearly a decade.
The fuel economy standards
were originally set at 18 mpg in 1975. In 1988, the average fuel economy
of cars was 28.6 mpg. Since then, the average fuel economy of cars has
dropped 2 percent.
According to the EPAs
annual statistics, 2003 model cars and trucks get worse gas mileage
20.8 mpg than last years models. This years rate was
6 percent below the peak efficiency of 22.1 mpg set 15 years ago.
"The numbers
could be higher," Elson said. "What automakers believe consumers
demand is what they will produce."
Today, SUVs are outselling
cars in the Pacific Northwest said Tom Jordan, spokesman for Diehl Ford
in Bellingham.
In 2002, Diehl Ford
sold 335 trucks and SUVs compared to 98 cars, said Colleen Sutliff of
Diehl Ford.
"Fuel efficiency
has continued to go down as SUV sales go up," said Jim DiPeso, policy
director for Republicans for Environmental Protection.
Northwest Environment
Watch spokesperson Elisa Murray said SUVs emit a record amount of carbon
dioxide, which contributes to global warming.
Light trucks, SUVs
and minivans consume about 25 percent more gas per mile and emit 30 percent
more carbon monoxide than smaller cars. They also emit 30 percent more
cancer-causing particles as well as nitrogen oxides and hydrocarbons that
cause respiratory illness, according to a report from Northwest Environmental
Watch.
In December 2002,
the Bush administration announced that CAFE standards for SUVs and light
trucks would be raised by 1.5 mpg over the next five years while the standard
for passenger cars would remain the same.
Due to the United
States dependence on foreign oil, this increase is not enough, DiPeso
said. The National Academy of Sciences stated that fuel economy could
be 10 times better than what the administration proposed.
"One point five
mpg is a very small increase and doesnt apply to our biggest problem,
vehicles over 6,000 pounds," said Michael Seal, director of the Vehicle
Research Institute at Western Washington University.
United States automakers
have found a way to avoid complying with CAFE standards by making SUVs
so large that they qualify for lenient air pollution rules originally
meant for farmers and businesses with large equipment. At the time, 6,000-pound
luxury vehicles were unheard of, DiPeso said.
Luxury vehicles such
as the Suburban, Ford Excursion and the Hummer are exempt from CAFE standards
entirely.
On Jan. 9, 2003, Bush
allowed the 6,000-pound SUVs to benefit from a large tax break. The amount
small business owners can deduct from their taxes when purchasing an SUV.
The tax deduction increased from $25,000 to $75,000.
With this increase,
the entire cost of vehicles such as the 2003 Hummer H2 could be written
off in one year. This encourages businesses to purchase SUVs rather than
passenger cars, which are not eligible for the deduction. Hummers get
10 mpg. Other vehicles targeted by the tax break, such as the Lincoln
Navigator, get 12 mpg, according to the Fuel Economy Guide of 2002.
"There is no
excuse for that at all," DiPeso said.
On the other hand,
fuel-efficient hybrid vehicles getting 61 mpg only qualify for a $2,000
tax break. According to the Sierra Club, this deduction is only allowed
until 2003, when it will be reduced 25 percent a year until it is completely
phased out. Upcoming hybrids such as the 2004 Ford Escape wont get
the full deduction.
On Jan. 28, 2003,
Bush announced that the administration would spend $1.2 billion on research
of hydrogen-powered fuel-cell vehicles to improve the environment and
help the country become energy independent.
"The first car
driven by a child born today could be powered by hydrogen, and pollution
free," Bush said in his State of the Union.
Seal said he disagrees.
He argues that a lot
of money has been spent on zero-emission research and producing hydrogen
cells requires tremendous energy, making such vehicles impossible to get
on the market. He said he believes the fuel-cell automobile is not going
to happen.
"If we were half
way there it would help, but were not," Seal said. "Weve
spent more than that already."
Although some environmental
groups agree with the research funding by the administration, the need
for short-term solutions remains.
"President Bushs
call for increased research on hydrogen-powered cars is a welcome step
toward a balanced national energy policy," DiPeso said. "However,
it will not do enough to reduce pollution, greenhouse gas emissions or
Middle Eastern oil dependence unless other near-term and long-term measures
are adopted."
Bushs policies
are a contradiction, Murray said.
Just two weeks after
announcing the SUV write-off Bush said a hydrogen-powered car would make
the country much less dependent on foreign sources of energy.
Its uncertain,
though, if people will buy fuel-efficient cars.
"Less than 50
percent (of customers) are concerned with fuel efficiency," Jordan
said. "Their buying decision is not affected, nor are they concerned
with the numbers."
|